During his stay at Rājagriha, Buddha frequented Griddhakūṭa and in
due course a vihāra was erected there for Buddha and the Saṅgha.
As mentioned in Buddhist texts, king Bimbisāra constructed a road to the
Griddhakūṭa hill for Buddha’s counsel. Chinese monk-scholar Faxian wrote that
he saw the ‘hall’, where Buddha used to preach law, in a pitiful
shape with only its foundations left (Beal 2005: 115). Writing two centuries
later, Xuanzang described a ‘magnificent brick hall’ on the Griddhakūṭa
peak (Beal 1969). In the 13th century, Tibetan monk-scholar
Dharmaswāmin saw ‘in ruins’ (Reorich 1959: 87-88) the temple where the Buddha preached. In spite of good or bad
situations of the physical structure of the temple, the pilgrimage to
Griddhakūṭa continued from the time of Buddha to when the pilgrimage
‘in the footsteps of the Buddha’ came to its ebb around the 13th -14th centuries.
The religious value of the stūpas and chatiya-s are sustained only by their physical renewal from time to time. In the 3rd millennium, the link between the sacred places and the community of followers of Buddhist teachings and traditions is getting stronger once again. Each year millions of devotees from all over the world come for a pilgrimage to the Griddhakūṭa. Seeing this development, it may be considered that now is the right time to undertake the restoration of the Griddhakūṭa vihāra.
The religious value of the stūpas and chatiya-s are sustained only by their physical renewal from time to time. In the 3rd millennium, the link between the sacred places and the community of followers of Buddhist teachings and traditions is getting stronger once again. Each year millions of devotees from all over the world come for a pilgrimage to the Griddhakūṭa. Seeing this development, it may be considered that now is the right time to undertake the restoration of the Griddhakūṭa vihāra.
Griddhakūṭa vihāra
is ‘museumized’ and is treated
as archaeological monument.
An aerial view of the remains of the sacred Griddhakūṭa vihāra (Vulture's peak). |
A view of the remains of the sacred Griddhakūṭa vihāra (Vulture's peak). |
Devotees offering
prayers at the remains of the sacred Griddhakūṭa vihāra
(Vulture's peak).
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is how the Griddhakūṭa vihāra must have looked at its prime 1500 years ago.
This is how the Griddhakūṭa vihāra must have looked at its prime 1500 years ago.
No remnants of the temple (Griddhakūṭa vihāra)
except for the brick foundation were discovered at the time of its excavation. Therefore, the conjecture sketch (elevation)
of the temple is completely conjectural, consistent with restored Mahābodhi
temple, Bodhgayā. The Mahābodhi temple and Griddhakūṭa vihāra are
contemporary Buddhist temples. The brick foundation of the
ancient temple suggests that the temple must have been around 25 ft high, a
fact also corroborated by 7th CE Chinese monk-scholar Xuanzang.
Conjectural sketches by Vipendra Singh Thakur----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buddhacārikā: A Living Religious Heritage
Stūpas and chatiya-s
built to mark the sublime wandering of Buddha (Buddhacārikā) are the
embodiment of Buddha and his teachings. The new circumstances in the 2nd millennium
were not conducive for the communities of monks to continue worshiping and
maintaining the sacred stūpas and chatiya-s. Followers
worldwide became physically disconnected with the sacred places, but
nevertheless, they remained connected through beliefs, rituals, narratives and
collective memories. Though there was a hiatus of six hundred years in Buddhist
pilgrimage and patronage, from the 13th to the 19th centuries, the sanctity of
the places have remained because of the spiritual association of the pilgrims
with the sublime wandering of Buddha. The sanctity associated with these
places makes the stūpas and chatiya-s a ‘living religious
heritage.’
The
discovery of the Buddhist origin of Bihār in the 19th century revealed
hundreds of significant places associated with the Buddhacārikā in
Bihār. Identification of places
mentioned in the Buddhist literature was the first stage of the process of
revitalisation of the sacred traces of Buddha because these places held
vital clues to understanding the history of Buddha and Buddhism, and their
relationship to the geography of Bihar.
Many of the identified sacred sites were brought under government protection
for archaeological study and subsequent conservation of their historical
and religious value. Ideally all the sites identified with the sublime
wandering of Buddha should have been listed on a priority basis and then
excavated, documented, examined and restored. But the number of protected and
unprotected sites are so large that this process is likely to take up several
decades at the least.
Fortunately, some of the important Buddhacārikā sites,
like Nālandā, Vaiśālī and Griddhakūṭa, were excavated and have today
become pilgrimage centres after a gap of more than one millennium. The devotees
who visit these sacred places make offerings and prayers to the excavated
remains of the stūpas and chatiya-s. At the unexcavated sites, like
Jeṭhian, Buddhavana, and Indrasailaguha they offer prayers to the ancient
mounds (stūpas, chatiya-s and vihāra-s) and fragmented Buddhist
sculptures.
During the 19th century, the British government in
India realized the significance of the Mahābodhi temple as the heart of
Buddhism. They immediately started the process of its revitalization and by
1881 the temple had been excavated, studied, documented and restored. Today, an
organisation named the Bodhgaya Temple Management Committee (BTMC) is in-charge
of looking after the daily rituals and other religious activities of the
temple.
Many other important ‘living religious heritage’ structures, like
Griddhakūṭa vihāra, the Ashokan Stūpa at Vaiśālī, Temple
no.3 at Nālandā are in queue to be restored. Unfortunately, they are have
been ‘museumized’ — they are treated as archaeological monuments, and in the
name of archaeological conservation, the dynamism of these sites are
compromised. However, it should be noted that safeguarding ‘living religious
heritage’ need not necessarily prevent change. Treatment of a ‘living heritage’
site as an archaeological site should be restricted to a timeframe. Once
the study and documentation of the site is completed, it should be
restored without compromising its archaeological significance.
Read about restoration of Buddha's statue at Griddhakūṭa Vihāra (Vulture's Peak)
Read more: Navigating around the Griddhakūṭa Vihāra (Vulture's Peak)
Bibliography:
Beal, S.; 2005, Travels
of Fah-hian and Sung-Yun, Buddhist Pilgrims from China to India, Low
Price Publications, Delhi:
(Originally published London: Trubner and Co.: 1869).
-------.1914,
The life of Hiuen-Tsiang by Shaman Hwui Li, Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner &
Co. Ltd, London. (New Edition
1911).
----------. 1969, Si-yu-ki: Buddhist
records of the Western World, Translated from the Chinese Of Hiuen Tsiang,
Oriental Books Reprint Corporation,Delhi, (1st Pub. 1884.
London: Trubner & Co.).
Reorich, George;
1959, Historical Research Series, Vol-II, Biography of Dharmaswāmin (Chag lo
tsa-ba Chos-rje-dpal), Published on behalf of Kashi Prasad Jaysawal
Research Institute, Patna by Shantilal Jain, Shri Jainendra Press,
Jawaharnagar, Delhi, K.P Jayaswal Research Institute.
No comments:
Post a Comment